6.05.2008

Narnia Betrayed

Hilary and I just walked out of Prince Caspian. Yes, we walked out. It is the first movie either of us have ever walked out on.

Why?

What Disney (and I assume the producers of the movie) have done to the story of Prince Caspian is nothing less than betrayal. Now, I admit my feelings are strong because I just read the book a few weeks ago. However, I went to the movie expecting a few minor changes, even ridiculous ones like what Peter Jackson did to Faramir in The Return of the King.

Not only were there minor changes that are annoying to long time fans of C.S. Lewis, the whole story was changed. Beloved characters were altered. In my wife's words: if screenwriters and directors are going to use the name of a book and use the names of the characters, and then give you something totally different, it is deceptive. It is a betrayal of the author, and it is a betrayal of everyone who goes to see the movie that expects the story of Prince Caspian.

The movie was awful. It was offensive. It was lame. 

First, I can understand condensing the chronology of a long book to suit the silver screen. I can also understanding altering minor details to keep them simple and focus on the main story. I cannot understand, however, why the writers/director would condense Lewis' original tale to make room for an awful fabrication that is a betrayal of Lewis' characters and stories.

The rewriting created a battle scene. The cost was Peter's character, Caspian's character, and Aslan's part in the story. After all, people only go to movies to see action and battle scenes, right? In the book, Peter and Miraz duel. There is no organized battle. In fact, the Caspian and Peter want to avoid a big battle. But Caspian is too wounded and does not have enough of his uncle's respect to fight. That's not very interesting. 

Secondly, the movie stripped Peter of everything that is honorable. Adamson, the director, made Peter a shallow, self-assertive teenager with little memory of his former nobility as high king of Narnia. He isn't even consistent with the last movie! Instead of the wise and noble former High King of Narnia, we have a puerile teenager who "doesn't want to be a kid anymore." So, Peter does everything he can to prove that he is capable and a grown up. He doesn't even feel the need to wait on Aslan.

Why is it that Hollywood feels the need to strip men of character of everything admirable? They did the exact same thing in Lord of the Rings with Faramir, even with Aragorn to a lesser extent. In that story too, it led to a fabrication in the story that irritated those who knew the story! Do directors and producers feel like Americans cannot relate to someone who is wise and admirable? Is it too unrealistic for us to see a man who has a sense of moral direction and duty? Nope, we can't handle that! Instead, give us petty teenage boys who constantly argue and blame one another for their own faults! That's what we want.

Please!

Then there is the Susan/Caspian romance. Yes, just what we need, another sappy teenage love story. Hilary and I should have known what was coming when we walked into the wrong showing and saw Susan kissing Caspian at the end. We should have gotten our money back then. Or after we saw, "Based on the story by C.S. Lewis," appear at the opening title. Nothing cries unbelievable distortion more than, "based on the story..." What it should say, "We took an idea from this story and ran with it in the wrong direction."

Again, most of the movie was completely fabricated. It was a lie! It never happened!

Back when Titanic came out, a Christian company was sued for editing out the Model T sex scene and reselling the movie. The obvious charge was copyright infringement. Why is it that movie producers feel they can do the very same thing with classic works of literature? They use the same title and the same characters, but they change the story so that it says something completely different! In my opinion, it is completely unethical. I cannot imagine that Lewis would have approved of the screenplay. Were he alive, he probably would have sued Disney for defamation of character! 

Most mind-blowing of all is Disney's patent disregard for those of us who grew up in Narnia. Their primary audience. I have loved these four kids and their companions in Narnia since I was a small boy. I always looked up to Peter. I wanted to be an admirable and wise leader like he was. Disney has betrayed me! They took creative liberties with the story I loved and said, "Here's Prince Caspian, just like you always wanted." But instead I find two boys and a story I rather loathe. And it makes me loathe Disney.

Their interpretation of Prince Caspian isn't even that good. Their changes to the plot don't flow well. The directing is bad. The dialogue is bad. Even the acting is bad. If I had known how bad it was going to be, I would have waited for it to come out on dvd.

It would have been helpful if our friends would have merely said, "it wasn't true to the story." All we heard were great reviews. That I don't understand. 

It is high time Hollywood stops screwing with classic books and beloved characters! If you are going to market a favorite book that we have grown up on, for the consideration of your audience, give us a faithful interpretation of the story!  As Iron Man and Spiderman have shown, movies based on well-known books and stories are better and more well-received when they receive a true interpretation. We want the old story, the original story, not some cock-eyed, modern day, "relevant" interpretation of the story. 

Whether we are talking about comic books or classic books, The Incredible Hulk or Prince Caspian, the real movie fans, those who pay to see Iron Man twice (like me), want to see the stories and characters we love faithfully portrayed.

5.24.2008

Potato Salad and other things

I just made my first potato salad. I haven't tried it yet, so I don't know if it's any good. But I put bacon in it just to make sure it will be edible.

We just read the first two books in Terry Pratchett's Discworld series (well, I did. Trey is still working on the second). It's a bit like reading Monty Python, except the character and plot development are more thorough (or should I say, it has character and plot development---the characters are actually dynamic! yay!).

By the way, we borrowed these books from the Sauerweins; I still haven't broken my vow (much to Uncle Jim's chagrin). But, Uncle Jim, this should encourage you: Trey went to a youth leaders' conference these weekend and bought upwards of ten new books. We have a new stack!!

I have been fairly productive today, so I think I'll go see if I can do some leisure now.

5.12.2008

Loss and Gain

Dearest friends and family, my friend Catherine is no longer suffering in this world. She will see earth again, but when it is new and free from bondage and when she has a whole body resurrected in righteousness.

Sometimes I wonder how time passes for those believers who have died and wait for the resurrection. Are they even bound by time? Does Catherine "wait" as we know it? If she does wait, it is in peace and in the presence of Jesus. What a gain for Catherine!

Please continue to pray for her family and many, many friends who experience loss now.

We wait for our time to gain. Lord Jesus, come!

5.07.2008

Segway? I thought it was spelled "Segue"

Okay, my lesson is done, so I can post. 

What was I going to write about...? Hmm.

Hilary and I are fans of Arrested Development. We are on disc two of the second season; (so far, we think the first was better). Gob (pronounced "Job," like the Bible character), often travels around on a Segway in the series. It is a remarkable mode of transportation: zero emissions, goofy, fun, and expensive. 

Last night, Hilary and I went to see Iron Man. It was a great movie. I had a blast watching it. Hilary had a blast watching me watch it. In one scene Obadiah, Tony Stark's primary business associate, drives a Segway around the Stark Enterprises complex. Immediately Hilary and I thought of Gob from Arrested Development.

Well, I was talking to Matt Geisman in the library today, and being an avid A.D. fan, I mentioned the mode of transportation Obadiah used in the movie. Until then, I hadn't known the name of the thing. I was immediately motivated to search the internet for this product, and found it here. I also found the link to the one and only Segway retailer in the state of Mississippi, Gliding Easy, LLC, which happens to be about 2 miles from our apartment in Olde Towne Clinton, MS. [Edit:: There is a store in Tupelo, so this isn't the one and only. Thanks, Kurt!]

So I high-tailed on over to find this joint. Apparently, the "store" is a 7'x12' room across from the Judo dojo, where I used to train. Inside were 8 or so Segway models, but no people. I picked up a brochure and came home for lunch. Gliding Easy, LLC specializes in "glided" tours around Clinton, the Natchez Trace, and a few other locations. I couldn't find the price on any of the models there, and so I did a google search. 

The average price range for a new Segway is $4000-$6000. Yeah, that's a hefty sum for a fancy way of getting from one place to another. The battery life will take you 40 miles at up to 12.5 mph. They are also highly customizable. You can set them up as golf carts, offroad/camping transportation, and for public travel. There are even 2, yes two, police models. 

Part of me wants one for the novelty of it. Another part of me wants one because of the rising cost of gasoline. I could save a load over time in getting from my future home to my future church and back. The rest of me realizes that this is a wholly ludicrous proposition. Church members would certainly question the wisdom of a youth pastor with a $5000 toy scooter.
I want to post something new, but I have to write my youth group lesson first. It's on

MONEY!!!1!